linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iio:proximity:hx9031as: Add TYHX HX9031AS/HX9023S sensor driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VcTxXsnKVR5EQYTNhokHeXrOxQPe9gAkWFRr0yZT1KTPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 17:00:59 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild@...ts.linux.dev, Yasin Lee <yasin.lee.x@...look.com>, jic23@...nel.org, 
	lkp@...el.com, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, lars@...afoo.de, 
	swboyd@...omium.org, nuno.a@...log.com, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, 
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	yasin.lee.x@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio:proximity:hx9031as: Add TYHX HX9031AS/HX9023S sensor driver

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 3:42 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aroorg> wrote:


> 5e5a419c9407f6 Yasin Lee 2024-05-10  1110  static ssize_t hx9031as_raw_data_show(struct file *file, char __user *user_buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> 5e5a419c9407f6 Yasin Lee 2024-05-10  1111  {
> 5e5a419c9407f6 Yasin Lee 2024-05-10  1112       char buf[BUF_SIZE] = {0};
> 5e5a419c9407f6 Yasin Lee 2024-05-10  1113       char *p = buf;
> 5e5a419c9407f6 Yasin Lee 2024-05-10  1114       int ii = 0;
> 5e5a419c9407f6 Yasin Lee 2024-05-10  1115
> 5e5a419c9407f6 Yasin Lee 2024-05-10  1116       hx9031as_sample();
> 5e5a419c9407f6 Yasin Lee 2024-05-10  1117       for (ii = 0; ii < HX9031AS_CH_NUM; ii++) {
> 5e5a419c9407f6 Yasin Lee 2024-05-10 @1118               p += snprintf(p, PAGE_SIZE, "ch[%d]: DIFF=%-8d, RAW=%-8d, OFFSET=%-8d, BL=%-8d, LP=%-8d\n",
>                                                                          ^^^^^^^^^


> Also use scnprintf() instead of snprintf() unless you need to check the
> results.

This is incorrect advice. You should recommend sysfs_emit() /
sysfs_emit_at() in this kind of case.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko