[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2d1dab52-72ab-4f4d-8f77-ae54f16b9b4a@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 10:34:41 +0200
From: Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
philipp.g.hortmann@...il.com, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] staging: rtl8192e: remove dead code
Am 27.05.24 um 09:39 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> This patch doesn't affect behavior at all, but to me the original
> author wrote the do nothing case for readability, and I don't have a
> problem with that. In fact, I applaud the author for caring about
> readability at all which is not a given in staging code. :P
Then I think it's better to leave it as is. :)
Should I send a v2 with this patched removed or will Greg just apply
the first two patches and ignore this one?
thanks,
Michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists