linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: hwmon: Add max6639

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240528-deduct-juggle-4ff2e7fae06e@spud>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 16:20:25 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...ements.com>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: hwmon: Add max6639

On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 07:41:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 5/28/24 07:26, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 06:21:21PM +0530, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> > > Add Devicetree binding documentation for Maxim MAX6639 temperature
> > > monitor with PWM fan-speed controller.
> > 
> > Other than unneeded |s where your descriptions don't have any
> > formatting, this patch looks fine. That said - where's your dts or your
> > driver? A binding on its own is unusual.
> > 
> 
> The driver is drivers/hwmon/max6639.c which needs other unrelated changes/
> cleanups. Holding those up until the bindings are accepted would not make
> sense, so my guess is that Naresh decided to pursue the other changes for now
> and add devicetree support to the driver after the devicetree properties
> have been approved. On the other side, adding devicetree support does depend
> on the other changes, so trying to do that before the other changes are
> complete would be difficult.
> 
> That is just my guess, though, and I am ok with it.

Well, I think the binding is fine, so it is up to you whether you want
to merge the binding without having the driver implementation nailed
down.

Ideally with the |s removed,
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Thanks,
Conor.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)