linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] platform/x86: dell-pc: Implement platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 10:16:17 -0600
From: "Lyndon Sanche" <lsanche@...deno.ca>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Mario Limonciello" <mario.limonciello@....com>,
 Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>, "Armin Wolf" <W_Armin@....de>,
 srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, "kernel test robot" <lkp@...el.com>,
 "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@...hat.com>, "Yijun Shen" <Yijun.Shen@...l.com>,
 "Matthew Garrett" <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
 "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
 "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>, "Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
 Dell.Client.Kernel@...l.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] platform/x86: dell-pc: Implement platform_profile

On Mon, May 27, 2024, at 3:39 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2024, Lyndon Sanche wrote:
>
>> +#include <linux/platform_profile.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include "dell-smbios.h"
>
> Add empty line between <> and "" includes.

Agreed.

>> +enum thermal_mode_bits {
>> +	DELL_BALANCED = BIT(0),
>> +	DELL_COOL_BOTTOM = BIT(1),
>> +	DELL_QUIET = BIT(2),
>> +	DELL_PERFORMANCE = BIT(3),
>
> A few nits still to address.
>
> Can you please align these so that the values align (IIRC, I asked this 
> earlier but perhaps my request was too unclear):
>
> 	DELL_XX			= BIT(X),
> 	DELL_YYYYYYYYY		= BIT(Y),
>

I must have missed this, I will get this corrected.

>> +static int thermal_get_supported_modes(int *supported_bits)
>> +{
>> +	struct calling_interface_buffer buffer;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	dell_fill_request(&buffer, 0x0, 0, 0, 0);
>> +	ret = dell_send_request(&buffer, CLASS_INFO, SELECT_THERMAL_MANAGEMENT);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		/* Thermal function not supported */
>> +		if (ret == -ENXIO) {
>> +			*supported_bits = 0;
>> +			return 0;
>> +		} else {
>
> Drop else because the previous block ends into return.
>

Agreed.

>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>
> Remove the outer if (ret) block and put the inner ones directly on the 
> main level as two if () conditions.
>

Agreed.

>> +	dell_fill_request(&buffer, 0x1, FIELD_PREP(DELL_ACC_SET_FIELD, acc_mode) | state, 0, 0);
>> +	ret = dell_send_request(&buffer, CLASS_INFO, SELECT_THERMAL_MANAGEMENT);
>> +	return ret;
>
> Return directly on the previous line.
>

Agreed.

>> +	int ret;
>> +	int supported_modes;
>> +
>> +	/* If thermal commands not supported, exit without error */
>
> Fix grammar, you're perhaps missing "are".
>

Agreed.

>> +	if (!dell_smbios_class_is_supported(CLASS_INFO))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	/* If thermal modes not supported, exit without error */
>
> Ditto.
>
> -- 
>  i.

Thank you for your feedback. I will include this in the next patch series.

Thanks,

Lyndon