[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <23be345b-1c5b-4c34-aa08-e81897c90ebf@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 09:49:04 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Bastien Curutchet <bastien.curutchet@...tlin.com>,
Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@...co.com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, herve.codina@...tlin.com,
christophercordahi@...ometrics.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: gpio: Add 'transition-delay-ms'
property
On 28/05/2024 08:59, Bastien Curutchet wrote:
>
>> So just like RC binding, that's not a property of I2C mux. Maybe this
>> fits usage of GPIO RC / delay binding.
>>
>
> IMHO that’s more of a MUX property than an RC binding because every MUX
> needs some time to switch from one bus to another. It’s just that for
> the vast majority of MUXes, this time is so small that it doesn’t need
> to be described.
Hm, true, it's fine then.
However this probably should be microseconds not milliseconds to allow
greater granularity, just like gpio-delay.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists