lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 09:50:34 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
 Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
 Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
 Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>,
 Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
 Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sa8775p-pas:
 Document the SA8775p ADSP, CDSP and GPDSP

On 28/05/2024 09:26, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 10:56 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 27/05/2024 10:43, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>>>
>>> Document the components used to boot the ADSP, CDSP0, CDSP1, GPDSP0 and
>>> GPDSP1 on the SA8775p SoC.
>>>
>>> Co-developed-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>
>>
>> Missing SoB.
>>
> 
> Does it though? The patch never passed through Tengfei's hands, I just
> wanted to give him credit for the work modifying the sm8550-pas
> bindings.

Then what was co-developed by Tengfei? If nothing, then indeed no SoB
but also no Co-developed-by. Docs are clear here: every Co-developed-by
*must* be followed by SoB.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ