[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y17ul0cb.fsf@geanix.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 12:03:48 +0200
From: Esben Haabendal <esben@...nix.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, Pratyush Yadav
<pratyush@...nel.org>, Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memory: fsl_ifc: Make FSL_IFC config visible and
selectable
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> writes:
> On 27/05/2024 09:47, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>>
>> Ok, I seem to still be confused as to what you want from me. If you are
>> saying that the kernel is not supposed to care about out-of-tree DTS
>> (and thereby any bootloader provided DTB), I would like to bring your
>> attention to arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/ls/ls1021a-twr.dts in upstream:
>>
>> &ifc {
>> #address-cells = <2>;
>> #size-cells = <1>;
>> /* NOR Flash on board */
>> ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x60000000 0x08000000>;
>> status = "okay";
>>
>> nor@0,0 {
>> #address-cells = <1>;
>> #size-cells = <1>;
>> compatible = "cfi-flash";
>> reg = <0x0 0x0 0x8000000>;
>> big-endian;
>> bank-width = <2>;
>> device-width = <1>;
>> };
>> };
>>
>
> I don't understand why it took so many emails to answer that (my first)
> question...
Because I did not understand the question. Primarely because I was (and
is) surprised that out-of-tree DTS is not supported. I was convinced
that out-of-tree DTS was the right way for hardware which is not
commonly available.
> Sounds good, however you did not update the existing select.
> Drivers are not supposed to select user-visible symbols (leads to
> issues), so you need to change it to depends and update defconfigs.
Do you wan this split into multiple commits, or a single commit changing
the Kconfig to make FSL_IFC user-visible, and changing select of it to
DEPENDS, and updating the related defconfig(s)?
/Esben
Powered by blists - more mailing lists