[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b3b02658-ffc4-4bd9-b77a-af65ae359474@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 13:46:39 +0100
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] statx: stx_subvol
On 12/03/2024 02:13, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 09:29:12PM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>> __u32 stx_dio_mem_align; /* Memory buffer alignment for direct I/O */
>> __u32 stx_dio_offset_align; /* File offset alignment for direct I/O */
>> + __u64 stx_subvol; /* Subvolume identifier */
>> /* 0xa0 */
>> - __u64 __spare3[12]; /* Spare space for future expansion */
>> + __u64 __spare3[11]; /* Spare space for future expansion */
>> /* 0x100 */
> The /* 0xa0 */ comment needs to be updated (or deleted).
I would tend to agree. Was this intentionally not updated (or deleted)?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists