lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 15:23:14 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
 Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@...il.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>,
 Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@...k-chips.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: rockchip: update rk3308 iomux routes

Am Dienstag, 28. Mai 2024, 14:18:35 CEST schrieb Dmitry Yashin:
> Hi Heiko,
> 
> On 5/28/24 4:52 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Hi Linus,
> >
> > Am Dienstag, 28. Mai 2024, 13:29:12 CEST schrieb Linus Walleij:
> >> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 2:17 PM Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@...il.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Some of the rk3308 iomux routes in rk3308_mux_route_data belong to
> >>> the rk3308b SoC. Remove them and correct i2c3 routes.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 7825aeb7b208 ("pinctrl: rockchip: add rk3308 SoC support")
> >>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@...il.com>
> >> While you guys are thinking about the RK3308B support, is this fix
> >> something I can just apply?
> > I'd think so. I've detailed stuff in my Review mail I just sent.
> > Both the soc itself and also the affected pin functions are niche
> > enough that this should not cause breakage.
> >
> >
> > Heiko
> >
> >
> >
> 
> Should i just drop 1/3 from V2 then?

I guess just check the state of affairs once your v2 is ready ;-) .

I.e. if LinusW grabs patch1 before you post v2, just drop it, otherwise
send it along.


> Thanks everyone for the feedback on this series. I'll prepare V2 based
> on runtime chip detection with use of GRF_CHIP_ID.





Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ