[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a54be779-9728-4ac4-9b85-8cf6787f491d@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 17:18:35 +0500
From: Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@...il.com>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>, Jianqun Xu
<jay.xu@...k-chips.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: rockchip: update rk3308 iomux routes
Hi Heiko,
On 5/28/24 4:52 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> Am Dienstag, 28. Mai 2024, 13:29:12 CEST schrieb Linus Walleij:
>> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 2:17 PM Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Some of the rk3308 iomux routes in rk3308_mux_route_data belong to
>>> the rk3308b SoC. Remove them and correct i2c3 routes.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 7825aeb7b208 ("pinctrl: rockchip: add rk3308 SoC support")
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@...il.com>
>> While you guys are thinking about the RK3308B support, is this fix
>> something I can just apply?
> I'd think so. I've detailed stuff in my Review mail I just sent.
> Both the soc itself and also the affected pin functions are niche
> enough that this should not cause breakage.
>
>
> Heiko
>
>
>
Should i just drop 1/3 from V2 then?
Thanks everyone for the feedback on this series. I'll prepare V2 based
on runtime chip detection with use of GRF_CHIP_ID.
--
Thanks,
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists