[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56f19120-7ddb-4006-99f6-e1b043ed88e1@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 15:32:12 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Esben Haabendal <esben@...nix.com>, Tudor Ambarus
<tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>,
Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>, Miquel Raynal
<miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Michael Ellerman
<mpe@...erman.id.au>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] memory: fsl_ifc: Make FSL_IFC config visible and
selectable
On 28/05/2024 15:15, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 28/05/2024 à 14:28, Esben Haabendal a écrit :
>> [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de esben@...nix.com. Découvrez pourquoi ceci est important à https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>
>> While use of fsl_ifc driver with NAND flash is fine, as the fsl_ifc_nand
>> driver selects FSL_IFC automatically, we need the CONFIG_FSL_IFC option to
>> be selectable for platforms using fsl_ifc with NOR flash.
>
> I don't understand.
>
> Shall I understand :
>
> While use of fsl_ifc driver with NAND flash is fine as the fsl_ifc_nand
> driver selects FSL_IFC automatically, ....
>
> or
>
> ..., as the fsl_ifc_nand driver selects FSL_IFC automatically we need
> the CONFIG_FSL_IFC option to be selectable for platforms using fsl_ifc
> with NOR flash
>
>
>
> I'm fine with the fact that you want to be able to select it when you
> use NOR flashes,
But users are not fine... their memory won't work if they cannot choose
it (if you meant select=choose).
> allthough I can't see why, but why do you need to
> change the "select" to a "depend" ? You should be able to leave it as a
As explained in v1: user-visible symbols should not be selected. Nothing
odd here.
> "select" in which case patch 2 wouldn't be necessary.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists