lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZldRVBPi4utAfRd8@gallifrey>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 16:01:24 +0000
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, jic23@...nel.org,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: adt7316: remove unused struct
 'adt7316_limit_regs'

* Dan Carpenter (dan.carpenter@...aro.org) wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 12:30:08AM +0100, linux@...blig.org wrote:
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
> > 
> > 'adt7316_limit_regs' has never been used since the original
> > commit 35f6b6b86ede ("staging: iio: new ADT7316/7/8 and ADT7516/7/9
> > driver").
> > 
> > The comment above it is a copy-and-paste from a different struct.
> > 
> > Remove both the struct and the comment.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@...blig.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c | 8 --------
> >  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c b/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c
> > index 79467f056a05..23d036d2802c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c
> > @@ -209,14 +209,6 @@ struct adt7316_chip_info {
> >  #define ADT7316_TEMP_AIN_INT_MASK	\
> >  	(ADT7316_TEMP_INT_MASK)
> >  
> > -/*
> > - * struct adt7316_chip_info - chip specific information
> > - */
> > -
> > -struct adt7316_limit_regs {
> > -	u16	data_high;
> > -	u16	data_low;
> > -};
> >  
> 
> Could you delete the blank line as well?  Otherwise we have two blank
> lines in a row and checkpatch will complain.

Sure, v2 sent.
(checkpatch didn't moan at me with or without).

Dave

> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 
> 
> 
-- 
 -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------   
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert    |       Running GNU/Linux       | Happy  \ 
\        dave @ treblig.org |                               | In Hex /
 \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org   |_______/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ