[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8ef9d8ad-9236-4254-b819-50832cd05cd9@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 11:39:36 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu/intel: Drop stray FAM6 check with new Intel CPU
model defines
On 5/29/24 11:36, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> The outer if () should have been dropped when switching to c->x86_vfm.
FWIW, we are going to need to do a pass over all of arch/x86 looking for
these. I suspect many of the 'if (c->x86 == ...) ' checks can go away
like this one.
Thanks for finding this one, though!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists