linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] coresight: Fix ref leak when of_coresight_parse

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024052957-overload-darkroom-8c4d@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 21:48:06 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@....com>, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	Suzuki Poulouse <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: Fix ref leak when
 of_coresight_parse_endpoint() fails

On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 09:30:11PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
> > Fix it by dropping the refcount in the exit condition.
> 
>                          reference counter?
> 
> How do you think about to use the summary phrase
> “Fix reference counting leak in of_get_coresight_platform_data()”?
> 
> Regards,
> Markus

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot