[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdRuK_sOF=25xP0azp8sOJ8DY_SRpLq9mUSaNEmWj5EAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 16:41:34 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: int3472: make common part a separate module
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 12:50 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> Linking an object file into multiple modules is not supported
> and causes a W=1 warning:
>
> scripts/Makefile.build:236: drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/Makefile: common.o is added to multiple modules: intel_skl_int3472_discrete intel_skl_int3472_tps68470
>
> Split out the common part here into a separate module to make it
> more reliable.
..
> obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SKL_INT3472) += intel_skl_int3472_discrete.o \
> - intel_skl_int3472_tps68470.o
> + intel_skl_int3472_tps68470.o \
> + intel_skl_int3472_common.o
A nit: Can this be put above instead?
..
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(skl_int3472_get_sensor_adev_and_name);
Are these namespaced?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists