linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 07/11] Documentation: core-api: Add math.h macros and functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZljRpSgApF6ZwGKD@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 22:21:09 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@...com>
Cc: mchehab@...nel.org, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com, sebastian.fricke@...labora.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	adobriyan@...il.com, jani.nikula@...el.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
	airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	corbet@....net, broonie@...nel.org, rdunlap@...radead.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
	praneeth@...com, nm@...com, vigneshr@...com, a-bhatia1@...com,
	j-luthra@...com, b-brnich@...com, detheridge@...com,
	p-mantena@...com, vijayp@...com, andrzej.p@...labora.com,
	nicolas@...fresne.ca, davidgow@...gle.com, dlatypov@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 07/11] Documentation: core-api: Add math.h macros and
 functions

On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 10:47:40PM +0530, Devarsh Thakkar wrote:
> Add documentation for rounding, scaling, absolute value and difference,
> 32-bit division related macros and functions exported by math.h header
> file.

..

> +Rounding, absolute value, scaling and 32bit division functions
> +--------------------------------------------------------------
> +
> +.. kernel-doc:: include/linux/math.h
> +   :internal:

Please, double check that this is correct keyword in this case.

Otherwise LGTM.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko