linux-kernel - Re: arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld: kernel/rcu/update.o:update.c:(.text+0x1cc4): more undefined references to `__bad

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5426b25f-9c25-4938-99e8-5cdea75e4d3b@paulmck-laptop>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 09:37:21 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
	Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
	rcu <rcu@...r.kernel.org>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, eeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld:
 kernel/rcu/update.o:update.c:(.text+0x1cc4): more undefined references to
 `__bad_cmpxchg' follow

On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 03:27:58PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2024, at 14:26, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 05:50:52PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> >> The arm builds failed on Linux next with gcc-13 and clang-18.
> >> 
> >> Config: arm imx_v6_v7_defconfig - failed
> >> 
> >> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> >> 
> >> Build log:
> >> -----
> >> arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld: kernel/rcu/update.o: in function
> >> `rcu_trc_cmpxchg_need_qs':
> >> update.c:(.text+0x348): undefined reference to `__bad_cmpxchg'
> >> arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld: kernel/rcu/update.o: in function
> >> `rcu_read_unlock_trace_special':
> >> update.c:(.text+0x41c): undefined reference to `__bad_cmpxchg'
> >> arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld: kernel/rcu/update.o: in function
> >> `trc_read_check_handler':
> >> update.c:(.text+0x4b0): undefined reference to `__bad_cmpxchg'
> >> arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld: kernel/rcu/update.o: in function `trc_inspect_reader':
> >> update.c:(.text+0x1518): undefined reference to `__bad_cmpxchg'
> >> arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld: update.c:(.text+0x1548): undefined reference
> >> to `__bad_cmpxchg'
> >> arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld: kernel/rcu/update.o:update.c:(.text+0x1cc4):
> >> more undefined references to `__bad_cmpxchg' follow
> >> make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.vmlinux:34: vmlinux] Error 1
> >
> > You get a reference to __bad_cmpxchg() when someone uses cmpxchg() on
> > a datatype that there are no CPU instructions to perform the atomic
> > compare-and-exchange.
> >
> > As we support 8-bit, 16-bit and 32-bit, I would expect that we're now
> > seeing cmpxchg() being used on 64-bit values, which are unsupportable
> > on 32-bit Arm.
> 
> A 64-bit cmpxchg() would fail on most 32-bit architectures,
> other than armv6k+ and i686+. Since this one fails on
> an armv6 (non-6k) build, it's probably the added 8-bit
> cmpxchg() that Paul talked about using for RCU, though I
> don't see that in linux-next here.
> 
> I htink we need to use the emulated cmpxchg8() in
> __cmpxchg() for this case, just like we do on other
> architectures that only have word size atomics.

Thank you all for your testing and analysis!

I will fix this, and also pull the 8046f3005015 ("rcu-tasks: Remove
open-coded one-byte cmpxchg() emulation") commit out of my -next pile
in the meantime.

							Thanx, Paul