linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] PCI: imx6: Fix\rename\clean up and add lut information for imx95

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240530172749.GA552716@bhelgaas>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 12:27:49 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
Cc: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Jason Liu <jason.hui.liu@....com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] PCI: imx6: Fix\rename\clean up and add lut
 information for imx95

On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 11:00:49AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 05:31:36PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 03:39:13PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> ...

> > > Base on linux-pci/controller/imx
> > 
> > This applies cleanly to the pci/controller/gpio branch, which has some
> > minor rework in pci-imx6.c.
> > 
> > When we apply this, I think we should do it on a a pci/controller/imx6
> > branch that is based on "main" (v6.10-rc1).
> > 
> > I can resolve the conflicts with pci/controller/gpio when building
> > pci/next.
> 
> Sorry, I forget update this. It should be base on linux-pci/next
> (e3fca37312892122d73f8c5293c0d1cc8c34500b). 

I prefer patches that are based on -rc1, i.e., the pci/main branch,
not on the pci/next branch.

If a series *requires* functionality that is already on a topic
branch, you can base it on that branch instead of on pci/main.

This series happens to touch some of the same code as
pci/controller/gpio, but it doesn't require those gpio changes, so it
does not need to be based on pci/controller/gpio.

Having this series based on pci/main means that if we update or drop
the gpio branch for some reason, this series will still make sense.

Bjorn