linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] PCI: imx6: Fix\rename\clean up and add lut information for imx95

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zli92VLw6IEVg97b@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 13:56:41 -0400
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Jason Liu <jason.hui.liu@....com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] PCI: imx6: Fix\rename\clean up and add lut
 information for imx95

On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 12:27:49PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 11:00:49AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 05:31:36PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 03:39:13PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> > ...
> 
> > > > Base on linux-pci/controller/imx
> > > 
> > > This applies cleanly to the pci/controller/gpio branch, which has some
> > > minor rework in pci-imx6.c.
> > > 
> > > When we apply this, I think we should do it on a a pci/controller/imx6
> > > branch that is based on "main" (v6.10-rc1).
> > > 
> > > I can resolve the conflicts with pci/controller/gpio when building
> > > pci/next.
> > 
> > Sorry, I forget update this. It should be base on linux-pci/next
> > (e3fca37312892122d73f8c5293c0d1cc8c34500b). 
> 
> I prefer patches that are based on -rc1, i.e., the pci/main branch,
> not on the pci/next branch.
> 
> If a series *requires* functionality that is already on a topic
> branch, you can base it on that branch instead of on pci/main.
> 
> This series happens to touch some of the same code as
> pci/controller/gpio, but it doesn't require those gpio changes, so it
> does not need to be based on pci/controller/gpio.
> 
> Having this series based on pci/main means that if we update or drop
> the gpio branch for some reason, this series will still make sense.

v4 should cleanly apply to pci/main. It is not big deal. Do you have any
additional comments for this series?

We still have some other works (such as simply suspend/resume by using
common PME turn off method), which base on this series.

Frank

> 
> Bjorn