[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f9091516-37ff-43d1-b515-ae8eb3f80e80@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 13:13:27 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>,
Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Cc: davidgow@...gle.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] list: test: remove unused struct 'klist_test_struct'
On 5/31/24 12:58, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Muhammad Usama Anjum (usama.anjum@...labora.com) wrote:
>> On 5/31/24 8:18 PM, linux@...blig.org wrote:
>>> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
>>>
>>> 'klist_test_struct' has been unused since the original
>>> commit 57b4f760f94d ("list: test: Test the klist structure").
>> Probably a fixes by tag would be needed here.
>
> I'm generally avoiding fixes tags in this set of changes, since
> a) They have no behavioural change at all.
> b) Downstream and stable kernel people use fixes tags to indicate
> stuff they should pick up if they have the original, and there's
> no need for them to do that with this cleanup.
>
> Dave
+1 on using careful use of Fixes tag only on real fixes for the
reasons mentioned above.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists