[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93a4b3f093a3105c4731fdac37cc1964b266302c.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 20:49:15 -0700
From: srinivas pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Lixu Zhang <lixu.zhang@...el.com>, Arnd
Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Benjamin
Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] HID: intel-ish-hid: fix endian-conversion
On Wed, 2024-05-29 at 15:18 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024, at 09:05, Zhang, Lixu wrote:
>
> > >
> > > for (i = 0; i < fragment->fragment_cnt && offset <
> > > ish_fw->size; i++) {
> > You added a parameter fragment_count, but you didn't use it. Did
> > you
> > intend to use it here?
> >
>
> My mistake, that was again broken in my incorrect
> rebase.
>
Do you have updated patch? Lixu can try and make sure that the
functionality is not broken by changes.
Thanks,
Srinivas
> Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists