linux-kernel - Re: [QUESTION] mm: Redundant const parameter?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 17:01:49 +0530
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
To: zhouchengming@...edance.com
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Anshuman.Khandual@....com
Subject: Re: [QUESTION] mm: Redundant const parameter?

I guess it would be better if I send this as a patch and wait for comments.

On 5/31/24 16:42, Dev Jain wrote:
> Hi Chengming,
>
> In mm/slub.c, you had defined slab_test_node_partial() to take a const 
> parameter.
>
> Is there any point of taking in a const, when you are anyways 
> typecasting it to
>
> a (struct folio *) from (const struct folio *) ? In fact, at the place 
> where you call
>
> slab_test_node_partial(), the struct slab *slab is not const.
>
> Please comment.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> DJ
>
>
>
>