[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <291daed8-a2e1-44d4-9a71-5bca2c585720@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 14:14:13 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Elinor Montmasson <elinor.montmasson@...oirfairelinux.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
shengjiu wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>,
Xiubo Lee <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
linux-sound <linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
alsa-devel <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 9/9] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl-asoc-card: add compatible
for generic codec
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 08:48:04AM -0400, Elinor Montmasson wrote:
> Then maybe it's not be a good idea to make this compatible generic
> for this contribution.
> The original intention is to bring support for the S/PDIF,
> so maybe the contribution should focus on this use case?
> In that case, would changing the compatible for "fsl,imx-audio-spdif-card"
> be acceptable?
> "fsl,imx-audio-spdif" is already used for the `imx-spdif.c`
> which does not use the ASRC.
Why not just use the existing compatible - why would someone not want to
be able to use the ASRC if it's available in their system?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists