linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] staging: iio: adt7316: remove unused struct 'adt7316_limit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240601202426.0f667a0d@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:24:26 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: linux@...blig.org, lars@...afoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com,
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: iio: adt7316: remove unused struct
 'adt7316_limit_regs'

On Thu, 30 May 2024 11:45:03 +0200
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 05:00:55PM +0100, linux@...blig.org wrote:
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
> > 
> > 'adt7316_limit_regs' has never been used since the original
> > commit 35f6b6b86ede ("staging: iio: new ADT7316/7/8 and ADT7516/7/9
> > driver").
> > 
> > The comment above it is a copy-and-paste from a different struct.
> > 
> > Remove both the struct and the comment.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@...blig.org>
Greg's bot is correct, but meh, not worth a v3.

I picked up Nuno's tag from v1 though. I don't think that came
in after you'd sent this, so I guess you missed that one.

Applied.

Jonathan

> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c | 9 ---------
> >  1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c b/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c
> > index 79467f056a05..f4260786d50a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c
> > @@ -209,15 +209,6 @@ struct adt7316_chip_info {
> >  #define ADT7316_TEMP_AIN_INT_MASK	\
> >  	(ADT7316_TEMP_INT_MASK)
> >  
> > -/*
> > - * struct adt7316_chip_info - chip specific information
> > - */
> > -
> > -struct adt7316_limit_regs {
> > -	u16	data_high;
> > -	u16	data_low;
> > -};
> > -
> >  static ssize_t adt7316_show_enabled(struct device *dev,
> >  				    struct device_attribute *attr,
> >  				    char *buf)
> > -- 
> > 2.45.1
> > 
> >   
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
> a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
> to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
> writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
> created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
> in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
> kernel tree.
> 
> You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
> as indicated below:
> 
> - This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
>   did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
>   Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
>   kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
>   needs to be done here to properly describe this.
> 
> If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
> how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
> Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
> from other developers.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h's patch email bot