linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] rust: block: add rnull, Rust null

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87wmn8mocd.fsf@metaspace.dk>
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2024 21:53:38 +0200
From: Andreas Hindborg <nmi@...aspace.dk>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,  Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,  Damien
 Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,  Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
  Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,  Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
  "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,  Andreas
 Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,  Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
  Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,  Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
  Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,  Wedson Almeida Filho
 <wedsonaf@...il.com>,  Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,  Gary Guo
 <gary@...yguo.net>,  Björn Roy Baron
 <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,  Benno
 Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,  Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
  Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>,  Luis Chamberlain
 <mcgrof@...nel.org>,  Yexuan Yang <1182282462@...t.edu.cn>,  Sergio
 González Collado <sergio.collado@...il.com>,  Joel
 Granados
 <j.granados@...sung.com>,  "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)"
 <kernel@...kajraghav.com>,  Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>,  Niklas
 Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@....com>,  Philipp Stanner <pstanner@...hat.com>,
  Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,  Johannes Thumshirn
 <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>,  Matias Bjørling
 <m@...rling.me>,  open list
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,  "rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org"
 <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>,  "lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
 <lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,  "gost.dev@...sung.com"
 <gost.dev@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] rust: block: add rnull, Rust null_blk
 implementation

Andreas Hindborg <nmi@...aspace.dk> writes:

> Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org> writes:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 01, 2024 at 05:36:20PM +0200, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>>> Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org> writes:
>>> 
>>> > On Sat, Jun 01, 2024 at 03:40:04PM +0200, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>>> >> +impl kernel::Module for NullBlkModule {
>>> >> +    fn init(_module: &'static ThisModule) -> Result<Self> {
>>> >> +        pr_info!("Rust null_blk loaded\n");
>>> >> +        let tagset = Arc::pin_init(TagSet::try_new(1, 256, 1), flags::GFP_KERNEL)?;
>>> >> +
>>> >> +        let disk = {
>>> >> +            let block_size: u16 = 4096;
>>> >> +            if block_size % 512 != 0 || !(512..=4096).contains(&block_size) {
>>> >> +                return Err(kernel::error::code::EINVAL);
>>> >> +            }
>>> >
>>> > You've set block_size to the literal 4096, then validate its value
>>> > immediately after? Am I missing some way this could ever be invalid?
>>> 
>>> Good catch. It is because I have a patch in the outbound queue that allows setting
>>> the block size via a module parameter. The module parameter patch is not
>>> upstream yet. Once I have that up, I will send the patch with the block
>>> size config.
>>> 
>>> Do you think it is OK to have this redundancy? It would only be for a
>>> few cycles.
>>
>> It's fine, just wondering why it's there. But it also allows values like
>> 1536 and 3584, which are not valid block sizes, so I think you want the
>> check to be:
>>
>> 	if !(512..=4096).contains(&block_size) || ((block_size & (block_size - 1)) != 0)
>
> Right, that makes sense. I modeled it after the C null_blk validation
> code in `null_validate_conf`. It contains this:
>
> 	dev->blocksize = round_down(dev->blocksize, 512);
> 	dev->blocksize = clamp_t(unsigned int, dev->blocksize, 512, 4096);
>
> That would have the same semantics, right? I guess I'll try to make a
> device with a 1536 block size and see what happens.

This happens:

root@...ian:~# insmod /mnt/linux-build/drivers/block/null_blk/null_blk.ko bs=1536
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
#PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
CPU: 2 PID: 291 Comm: insmod Not tainted 6.10.0-rc1+ #839

Probably a good idea with a better check.

BR Andreas