[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZlvrwbQ1WJZQ6_KR@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 04:49:21 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc: Andreas Hindborg <nmi@...aspace.dk>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Yexuan Yang <1182282462@...t.edu.cn>,
Sergio González Collado <sergio.collado@...il.com>,
Joel Granados <j.granados@...sung.com>,
"Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@...kajraghav.com>,
Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>,
Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@....com>,
Philipp Stanner <pstanner@...hat.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>,
Matias Bjørling <m@...rling.me>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org" <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>,
"lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"gost.dev@...sung.com" <gost.dev@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] rust: block: add rnull, Rust null_blk
implementation
On Sat, Jun 01, 2024 at 10:01:40AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> It's fine, just wondering why it's there. But it also allows values like
> 1536 and 3584, which are not valid block sizes, so I think you want the
> check to be:
>
> if !(512..=4096).contains(&block_size) || ((block_size & (block_size - 1)) != 0)
I'd drop the range check. We're pretty close to landing the bs>PS
patches, so just
if block_size & block_size - 1 != 0
should be enough of a validation. Is it considered "good style" in
Rust to omit the brackets here?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists