linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] hwmon: Add support for SPD5118 compliant temperature sensors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <baktuhx525cyrxam63z4oyy62p35s3n7n7wsv3yz6opyoprp6z@vtxlfwdejdmt>
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:18:17 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>, 
	Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>, René Rebe <rene@...ctcode.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] hwmon: Add support for SPD5118 compliant
 temperature sensors


> would introduce a cross-subsystem dependency. Of course, that depends a bit
> on your position about such dependencies. If I do that as part of this series,
> would you Ack it, or would you want to handle that through the i2c tree ?

I would ack it. If I'd have a conflicting commit in my tree (unlikely),
I'd ask you for an immutable branch to pull into my tree.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)