linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] hwmon: Add support for SPD5118 compliant temperature sensors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <006ab9a8-f1d4-466f-82c4-eff219ccf617@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 14:24:06 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
 linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>, Thomas Weißschuh
 <linux@...ssschuh.net>, René Rebe <rene@...ctcode.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] hwmon: Add support for SPD5118 compliant
 temperature sensors

On 6/2/24 13:18, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
>> would introduce a cross-subsystem dependency. Of course, that depends a bit
>> on your position about such dependencies. If I do that as part of this series,
>> would you Ack it, or would you want to handle that through the i2c tree ?
> 
> I would ack it. If I'd have a conflicting commit in my tree (unlikely),
> I'd ask you for an immutable branch to pull into my tree.
> 

Sounds good.

Turns out we can not entirely remove the detect code anyway.
i2c_register_spd() depends on DMI support, which is not a given
on all systems supporting DDR5, and it is limited to a maximum
of 8 memory modules. I'll try to make it conditional with a
configuration option.

Thanks,
Guenter