[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bk4i6vyx.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2024 14:40:06 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas@...der.be>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Magnus
Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>, Lad Prabhakar
<prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] irqchip/renesas-rzg2l: Add support for RZ/Five SoC
On Tue, Apr 30 2024 at 15:14, Prabhakar wrote:
> +
> +static void rzfive_irqc_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + rzfive_tint_irq_endisable(d, false);
> + irq_chip_disable_parent(d);
> +}
> +
> +static void rzfive_irqc_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + rzfive_tint_irq_endisable(d, true);
> + irq_chip_enable_parent(d);
> +}
This looks wrong. Enable/disable should be symmetric vs. ordering, no?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists