linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: mtd: spinand: macronix: Add support for serial NAND flash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 15:18:54 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Cheng Ming Lin <linchengming884@...il.com>, dwmw2@...radead.org,
 computersforpeace@...il.com, marek.vasut@...il.com, vigneshr@...com,
 linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 stable@...r.kernel.org, richard@....at, alvinzhou@...c.com.tw,
 leoyu@...c.com.tw, Cheng Ming Lin <chengminglin@...c.com.tw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: mtd: spinand: macronix: Add support for
 serial NAND flash

Hi,

gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote on Mon, 3 Jun 2024 09:58:23 +0200:

> On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 03:39:53PM +0800, Cheng Ming Lin wrote:
> > From: Cheng Ming Lin <chengminglin@...c.com.tw>

The title prefix contains "Documentation: ", but I don't see anything
related in the diff.

> > 
> > MX35UF{1,2,4}GE4AD and MX35UF{1,2}GE4AC have been merge into 
> > Linux kernel mainline.   
> 
> Trailing whitespace :(
> 
> > Commit ID: "c374839f9b4475173e536d1eaddff45cb481dbdf".  
> 
> See the kernel documentation for how to properly reference commits in
> changelog messages.
> 
> > For SPI-NAND flash support on Linux kernel LTS v5.4.y,
> > add SPI-NAND flash MX35UF{1,2,4}GE4AD and MX35UF{1,2}GE4AC in id tables.
> > 
> > Those five flashes have been validate on Xilinx zynq-picozed board and
> > Linux kernel LTS v5.4.y.  
> 
> What does 5.4.y have to do with the latest mainline tree?  Is this
> tested on our latest tree?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h


Thanks,
Miquèl