[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zl3C1Gt0-LvLWl4g@bogus>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 14:19:16 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc: cristian.marussi@....com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pmdomain: arm: scmi_pm_domain: set flag
GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 09:18:33PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>
> Set flag GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP to scmi genpd, then when a device
> is set as wakeup source using device_set_wakeup_enable, the power
> domain could be kept on to make sure the device could wakeup the system.
>
I am fine with the change, wonder if it can be made conditional but I can't
think of a sane way to do so. If Ulf thinks it is harmless to keep it
unconditional on all the domains, then I am fine with that.
I assume Ulf can pick this up directly,
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists