linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: nvmem: Use soc-nvmem node name instead of nvmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240603145201.GA414800-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 09:52:01 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, monstr@...str.eu, michal.simek@...inx.com,
	git@...inx.com, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Kalyani Akula <kalyani.akula@....com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Praveen Teja Kundanala <praveen.teja.kundanala@....com>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/ZYNQ ARCHITECTURE" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: nvmem: Use soc-nvmem node name instead of
 nvmem

On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 10:53:50AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> Based on commit d8764d347bd7 ("dt-bindings: firmware: xilinx: Describe
> soc-nvmem subnode") soc-nvmem should be used instead of simple nvmem that's
> why also update example to have it described correctly everywhere.
> 
> Fixes: a0cfd5e99782 ("dt-bindings: nvmem: Convert xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.txt to yaml")
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
> ---
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.yaml | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.yaml
> index 917c40d5c382..1cbe44ab23b1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.yaml
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ unevaluatedProperties: false
>  
>  examples:
>    - |
> -    nvmem {
> +    soc-nvmem {

This doesn't seem like an improvement. Is there another nvmem node at 
this level? I would fix the binding instead if not.

>          compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem-fw";
>          nvmem-layout {
>              compatible = "fixed-layout";
> -- 
> 2.40.1
>