[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b2c6a97d-6722-44d9-900b-a10e169bd16e@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 17:12:31 +0200
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, monstr@...str.eu, michal.simek@...inx.com,
git@...inx.com, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Kalyani Akula <kalyani.akula@....com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Praveen Teja Kundanala <praveen.teja.kundanala@....com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/ZYNQ ARCHITECTURE" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: nvmem: Use soc-nvmem node name instead of
nvmem
On 6/3/24 16:52, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 10:53:50AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>> Based on commit d8764d347bd7 ("dt-bindings: firmware: xilinx: Describe
>> soc-nvmem subnode") soc-nvmem should be used instead of simple nvmem that's
>> why also update example to have it described correctly everywhere.
>>
>> Fixes: a0cfd5e99782 ("dt-bindings: nvmem: Convert xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.txt to yaml")
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
>> ---
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.yaml | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.yaml
>> index 917c40d5c382..1cbe44ab23b1 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.yaml
>> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ unevaluatedProperties: false
>>
>> examples:
>> - |
>> - nvmem {
>> + soc-nvmem {
>
> This doesn't seem like an improvement. Is there another nvmem node at
> this level? I would fix the binding instead if not.
That name came from discussion with Conor. None suggested to fix dt-schema
that's why soc-nvmem has been propagated to DT already and this patch is just
fixing last occurrence.
commit d8764d347bd737efec00fae81133ffad0ae084bb (tag: zynqmp-dt-for-6.9)
Author: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
AuthorDate: Wed Jan 31 10:17:28 2024 +0100
dt-bindings: firmware: xilinx: Describe soc-nvmem subnode
Describe soc-nvmem subnode as the part of firmware node. The name can't be
pure nvmem because dt-schema already defines it as array property that's
why different name should be used.
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/24fe6adbf2424360618e8f5ca541ebfd8bb0723e.1706692641.git.michal.simek@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
Thanks,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists