linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: nvmem: Use soc-nvmem node name instead of nvmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 08:36:58 +0200
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, monstr@...str.eu, michal.simek@...inx.com,
 git@...inx.com, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Kalyani Akula <kalyani.akula@....com>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Praveen Teja Kundanala <praveen.teja.kundanala@....com>,
 Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
 "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
 <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 "moderated list:ARM/ZYNQ ARCHITECTURE" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: nvmem: Use soc-nvmem node name instead of
 nvmem

Hi Rob,

On 6/3/24 17:12, Michal Simek wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/3/24 16:52, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 10:53:50AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>>> Based on commit d8764d347bd7 ("dt-bindings: firmware: xilinx: Describe
>>> soc-nvmem subnode") soc-nvmem should be used instead of simple nvmem that's
>>> why also update example to have it described correctly everywhere.
>>>
>>> Fixes: a0cfd5e99782 ("dt-bindings: nvmem: Convert xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.txt to 
>>> yaml")
>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.yaml | 2 +-
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.yaml 
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.yaml
>>> index 917c40d5c382..1cbe44ab23b1 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.yaml
>>> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ unevaluatedProperties: false
>>>   examples:
>>>     - |
>>> -    nvmem {
>>> +    soc-nvmem {
>>
>> This doesn't seem like an improvement. Is there another nvmem node at
>> this level? I would fix the binding instead if not.
> 
> That name came from discussion with Conor. None suggested to fix dt-schema 
> that's why soc-nvmem has been propagated to DT already and this patch is just 
> fixing last occurrence.
> 
> commit d8764d347bd737efec00fae81133ffad0ae084bb (tag: zynqmp-dt-for-6.9)
> Author:     Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
> AuthorDate: Wed Jan 31 10:17:28 2024 +0100
> 
>      dt-bindings: firmware: xilinx: Describe soc-nvmem subnode
> 
>      Describe soc-nvmem subnode as the part of firmware node. The name can't be
>      pure nvmem because dt-schema already defines it as array property that's
>      why different name should be used.
> 
>      Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>      Link: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/24fe6adbf2424360618e8f5ca541ebfd8bb0723e.1706692641.git.michal.simek@amd.com
>      Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>

Any comment on this one?

Thanks,
Michal