linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] usb: host: xhci-plat: Add support for XHCI_WRITE_64_HI_LO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1935a30f-b4fd-4240-93f0-e2baf218223d@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 08:20:44 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Jung Daehwan <dh10.jung@...sung.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Thinh Nguyen
 <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>, Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
 Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
 "open list:USB SUBSYSTEM" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
 "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
 <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] usb: host: xhci-plat: Add support for
 XHCI_WRITE_64_HI_LO_QUIRK

On 03/06/2024 10:51, Jung Daehwan wrote:
>>>>>  
>>>>> +		if (device_property_read_bool(tmpdev, "write-64-hi-lo-quirk"))
>>>>> +			xhci->quirks |= XHCI_WRITE_64_HI_LO;
>>>>
>>>> Where is any user of this property (DTS)? Just to clarify: your
>>>> downstream does not matter really.
>>>>
>>>
>>> This is set by dwc3 parent node by software node.
>>>
>>> [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: usb: snps,dwc3: Add 'snps,xhci-write-64-hi-lo-quirk' quirk
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/1717135657-120818-2-git-send-email-dh10.jung@samsung.com/
>>
>> This is not a patch to DTS.
>>
>>
> 
> This is set by software node from dwc3. That's why I think this patch doesn't
> need DTS patch. I would add DTS patch in dwc3 not xhci if it's needed.
> 

What?

I asked you question which upstream SoC (link to DTS) uses it, and you
say that "no need for DTS patch"? That's not an answer.

Best regards,
Krzysztof