linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] dt-bindings: iio: dac: Add adi,ltc2672.yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3dadacf8-1349-483d-b264-dcb41d2cc3fc@baylibre.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 08:53:27 -0500
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
 Kim Seer Paller <kimseer.paller@...log.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen
 <lars@...afoo.de>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Dimitri Fedrau <dima.fedrau@...il.com>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
 Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] dt-bindings: iio: dac: Add adi,ltc2672.yaml

On 6/4/24 1:47 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/06/2024 21:59, David Lechner wrote:
>> On 6/2/24 8:21 PM, Kim Seer Paller wrote:
>>> Add documentation for ltc2672.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/171643825573.1037396.2749703571529285460.robh@kernel.org/
>>> Co-developed-by: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kim Seer Paller <kimseer.paller@...log.com>
>>> ---
>>>  .../bindings/iio/dac/adi,ltc2672.yaml         | 158 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>  MAINTAINERS                                   |   1 +
>>>  2 files changed, 159 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/adi,ltc2672.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/adi,ltc2672.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/adi,ltc2672.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..d143a9db7010
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/adi,ltc2672.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/dac/adi,ltc2672.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: Analog Devices LTC2672 DAC
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> +  - Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>
>>> +  - Kim Seer Paller <kimseer.paller@...log.com>
>>> +
>>> +description: |
>>> +  Analog Devices LTC2672 5 channel, 16 bit, 300mA DAC
>>> +  https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/ltc2672.pdf
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    enum:
>>> +      - adi,ltc2672
>>
>> The linked datasheet describes 12-bit and 16-bit versions, so should we have
>> two compatibles here? adi,ltc2672-12, adi,ltc2672-16
> 
> Is their programming model different?
> 

I replied to myself already with the answer. After looking at it more it
does not appear that is the case.