[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240605125232.5xql5nonllyslchc@saucy>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 07:52:32 -0500
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Jai Luthra <j-luthra@...com>
CC: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>,
Vignesh Raghavendra
<vigneshr@...com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>,
Devarsh Thakkar
<devarsht@...com>, Bryan Brattlof <bb@...com>,
Aradhya Bhatia
<a-bhatia1@...com>,
Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-verdin: Drop McASP AFIFOs
On 14:28-20240605, Jai Luthra wrote:
> Hi Francesco,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On Jun 05, 2024 at 10:47:13 +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > Hello Jai, thanks for the patch.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 03:11:06PM +0530, Jai Luthra wrote:
> > > McASP AFIFOs are not necessary with UDMA-P/BCDMA as there is buffering
> > > on the DMA IP. Drop these for better audio latency.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 316b80246b16 ("arm64: dts: ti: add verdin am62")
> > > Signed-off-by: Jai Luthra <j-luthra@...com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-verdin.dtsi | 8 ++++----
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-verdin.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-verdin.dtsi
> > > index 2038c5e04639..27e5220e1dc7 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-verdin.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-verdin.dtsi
> > > @@ -1364,8 +1364,8 @@ &mcasp0 {
> > > 0 0 0 0
> > > >;
> > > tdm-slots = <2>;
> > > - rx-num-evt = <32>;
> > > - tx-num-evt = <32>;
> > > + rx-num-evt = <0>;
> > > + tx-num-evt = <0>;
> >
> > From my understanding of the dt-binding having these properties set to
> > <0> is equivalent to not having those properties at all.
> > My suggestion would be to just remove those, therefore.
> >
>
> I was following the existing convention of setting it to 0 for
> disabling, as done in k3-j721e-common-proc-board.dts
>
> IMO it is better to keep it explicit, but I don't feel strongly against
> dropping it either (as long as we do the same for j721e). Will defer the
> decision to the tree maintainers.
>
If they are equivalent, then just drop them.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
Powered by blists - more mailing lists