[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yd4doskkq443xkvc4ahnxexyi7f5oteoh5egiv3plcduyl7dfr@dgtdwd3dbdkg>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 14:28:22 +0530
From: Jai Luthra <j-luthra@...com>
To: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
CC: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Tero
Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jayesh
Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>,
Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@...com>, Bryan
Brattlof <bb@...com>,
Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@...com>,
Francesco Dolcini
<francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 5/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-verdin: Drop McASP AFIFOs
Hi Francesco,
Thanks for the review.
On Jun 05, 2024 at 10:47:13 +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> Hello Jai, thanks for the patch.
>
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 03:11:06PM +0530, Jai Luthra wrote:
> > McASP AFIFOs are not necessary with UDMA-P/BCDMA as there is buffering
> > on the DMA IP. Drop these for better audio latency.
> >
> > Fixes: 316b80246b16 ("arm64: dts: ti: add verdin am62")
> > Signed-off-by: Jai Luthra <j-luthra@...com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-verdin.dtsi | 8 ++++----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-verdin.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-verdin.dtsi
> > index 2038c5e04639..27e5220e1dc7 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-verdin.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-verdin.dtsi
> > @@ -1364,8 +1364,8 @@ &mcasp0 {
> > 0 0 0 0
> > >;
> > tdm-slots = <2>;
> > - rx-num-evt = <32>;
> > - tx-num-evt = <32>;
> > + rx-num-evt = <0>;
> > + tx-num-evt = <0>;
>
> From my understanding of the dt-binding having these properties set to
> <0> is equivalent to not having those properties at all.
> My suggestion would be to just remove those, therefore.
>
I was following the existing convention of setting it to 0 for
disabling, as done in k3-j721e-common-proc-board.dts
IMO it is better to keep it explicit, but I don't feel strongly against
dropping it either (as long as we do the same for j721e). Will defer the
decision to the tree maintainers.
> With that said, in any case, whatever you do my suggested change or
> not,
>
> Acked-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>
>
> Francesco
>
--
Thanks,
Jai
GPG Fingerprint: 4DE0 D818 E5D5 75E8 D45A AFC5 43DE 91F9 249A 7145
Powered by blists - more mailing lists