linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] drivers: remoteproc: xlnx: add attach detach support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4b401ee7-73b8-4974-848c-5a181c0bdb81@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 12:47:24 -0500
From: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc: mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drivers: remoteproc: xlnx: add attach detach support



On 6/4/24 3:23 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 01:34:38PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>> It is possible that remote processor is already running before
>> linux boot or remoteproc platform driver probe. Implement required
>> remoteproc framework ops to provide resource table address and
>> connect or disconnect with remote processor in such case.
>> 
> 
> I know if changes the current style for this driver, but could we drop
> "drivers: " from the subject prefix, to align changes to this driver
> with others?
> 

Ack. Will be fixed. Is it convention not to have "drivers" ?
If so, from now on, I will format subject prefix: <subsystem>/<platform>:

> Regards,
> Bjorn