linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] drivers: remoteproc: xlnx: add attach detach support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANLsYky3f9cw-nY2Q--uniB4k1QfHkCy8JLi+XcaxYZKHw8jnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 15:04:03 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drivers: remoteproc: xlnx: add attach detach support

On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 at 11:47, Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/4/24 3:23 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 01:34:38PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> >> It is possible that remote processor is already running before
> >> linux boot or remoteproc platform driver probe. Implement required
> >> remoteproc framework ops to provide resource table address and
> >> connect or disconnect with remote processor in such case.
> >>
> >
> > I know if changes the current style for this driver, but could we drop
> > "drivers: " from the subject prefix, to align changes to this driver
> > with others?
> >
>
> Ack. Will be fixed. Is it convention not to have "drivers" ?

"drivers" is not needed.

> If so, from now on, I will format subject prefix: <subsystem>/<platform>:
>

That will be just fine.

> > Regards,
> > Bjorn
>