[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <659dfd80-5962-4265-836d-5761c3e41ca0@incomsystems.biz>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 14:45:42 -0500
From: Jonathan Bennett <jbennett@...omsystems.biz>
To: Sam Edwards <cfsworks@...il.com>, Heiko Stübner
<heiko@...ech.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Kukieła <daniel@...iela.pl>,
Sven Rademakers <sven.rademakers@...il.com>, Joshua Riek <jjriek@...izon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add PCIe pinctrls to Turing RK1
On 12/8/23 11:27 AM, Sam Edwards wrote:
>
>
> On 12/8/23 04:05, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>> Hi Sam,
>>
>> Am Freitag, 8. Dezember 2023, 07:25:10 CET schrieb Sam Edwards:
>>> The RK3588 PCIe 3.0 controller seems to have unpredictable behavior
>>> when
>>> no CLKREQ/PERST/WAKE pins are configured in the pinmux. In
>>> particular, it
>>> will sometimes (varying between specific RK3588 chips, not over
>>> time) shut
>>> off the DBI block, and reads to this range will instead stall
>>> indefinitely.
>>>
>>> When this happens, it will prevent Linux from booting altogether. The
>>> PCIe driver will stall the CPU core once it attempts to read the
>>> version
>>> information from the DBI range.
>>>
>>> Fix this boot hang by adding the correct pinctrl configuration to the
>>> PCIe 3.0 device node, which is the proper thing to do anyway. While
>>> we're at it, also add the necessary configuration to the PCIe 2.0 node,
>>> which may or may not fix the equivalent problem over there -- but is
>>> the
>>> proper thing to do anyway. :)
>>>
>>> Fixes: 2806a69f3fef6 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Turing RK1 SoM
>>> support")
>>> Signed-off-by: Sam Edwards <CFSworks@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> Compared to v1, v2 removes the `reset-gpios` properties as well --
>>> this should
>>> give control of the PCIe resets exclusively to the PCIe cores. (And
>>> even if the
>>> `reset-gpios` props had no effect in v1, it'd be confusing to have
>>> them there.)
>>
>> Hmm, I'd think this could result in differing behaviour.
>>
>> I.e. I tried the same on a different board with a nvme drive on the
>> pci30x4
>> controller. But moving the reset from the gpio-way to "just" setting the
>> perstn pinctrl, simply hung the controller when probing the device.
>
> Ah, I'm guessing it died in:
> ver = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_VERSION_NUMBER);
>
> If so, that's the same hang that this patch is aiming to solve. I'm
> starting to wonder if having muxed pins != 1 for a given signal upsets
> the RC(s). Is your board (in an earlier boot stage:
> reset/maskrom/bootloader) muxing a different perstn pin option to that
> controller (and Linux doesn't know to clear it away)? Then when you
> add the perstn pinctrl the total number of perstns muxed to the
> controller comes to 2, and without a reset-gpios = <...>; to take it
> away again, that number stays at 2 to cause the hang upon the DBI read?
>
> If so, that'd mean the change resolves the hang for me, because it
> brings the total up to 1 (from 0), but also causes the hang for you,
> because it brings the total up to 2 (away from 1).
>
>>
>> So I guess I'd think the best way would be to split the pinctrl up
>> into the
>> 3 separate functions (clkreqn, perstn, waken) so that boards can include
>> them individually.
>
> Mm, maybe. Though that might be more appropriate if a board comes
> along that doesn't connect all of those signals to the same group of
> pins. I worry that attempting to solve this hang by doing that will
> instead just mask the real problem.
>
>>
>> Nobody is using the controller pinctrl entries so far anyway :-) .
>
> Then it's interesting that this board requires them in order to avoid
> a hang on boot. I'll see if there's anything else that I can find out.
I've just finished testing the latest iteration of this patch with
6.10-rc2 on my RK1 on a Turing Pi 2 carrier board. I can confirm that
unpatched mainline fails to boot with the same hang described here, and
the patch does make the board boot again.
--Jonathan Bennett
>
> Happy Friday,
> Sam
>
>>
>>
>> Heiko
>>
>>
>>> Note that it is OK for the pcie2x1l1 node to refer to
>>> pcie30x1m1_pins. The
>>> pcie2x1l1 device is *in fact* a PCIe 3.0 controller, and the
>>> pcie30x1m1_pins
>>> pinmux setting is so-named to reflect this. The pcie2x1l1 node is
>>> so-named
>>> because Linux does not (currently) support routing it to a PCIe 3.0
>>> PHY; so in
>>> practice it is effectively a PCIe 2.0 controller, for the time being.
>>>
>>> Cheers and thank you for your time,
>>> Sam
>>>
>>> ---
>>> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dtsi | 16
>>> ++--------------
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dtsi
>>> index 9570b34aca2e..875446fdb67e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dtsi
>>> @@ -214,8 +214,7 @@ rgmii_phy: ethernet-phy@1 {
>>> &pcie2x1l1 {
>>> linux,pci-domain = <1>;
>>> pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> - pinctrl-0 = <&pcie2_reset>;
>>> - reset-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie30x1m1_pins>;
>>> status = "okay";
>>> };
>>> @@ -226,8 +225,7 @@ &pcie30phy {
>>> &pcie3x4 {
>>> linux,pci-domain = <0>;
>>> pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> - pinctrl-0 = <&pcie3_reset>;
>>> - reset-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie30x4m1_pins>;
>>> vpcie3v3-supply = <&vcc3v3_pcie30>;
>>> status = "okay";
>>> };
>>> @@ -245,17 +243,7 @@ hym8563_int: hym8563-int {
>>> };
>>> };
>>> - pcie2 {
>>> - pcie2_reset: pcie2-reset {
>>> - rockchip,pins = <4 RK_PA2 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
>>> - };
>>> - };
>>> -
>>> pcie3 {
>>> - pcie3_reset: pcie3-reset {
>>> - rockchip,pins = <4 RK_PB6 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
>>> - };
>>> -
>>> vcc3v3_pcie30_en: pcie3-reg {
>>> rockchip,pins = <2 RK_PC5 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
>>> };
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists