linux-kernel - [PATCH v3] resource: add a simple test for walk_iomem_res

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240605195324.3213954-1-olvaffe@gmail.com>
Date: Wed,  5 Jun 2024 12:53:10 -0700
From: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] resource: add a simple test for walk_iomem_res_desc()

This mainly tests that find_next_iomem_res() does not miss resources.

Signed-off-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>

---
v2: update subject, use DEFINE_RES_NAMED and hardcoded offsets
v3: really hardcode offsets
---
 kernel/resource_kunit.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/resource_kunit.c b/kernel/resource_kunit.c
index 58ab9f914602b..1a562d0978477 100644
--- a/kernel/resource_kunit.c
+++ b/kernel/resource_kunit.c
@@ -137,9 +137,74 @@ static void resource_test_intersection(struct kunit *test)
 	} while (++i < ARRAY_SIZE(results_for_intersection));
 }
 
+static int resource_walk_count(struct resource *res, void *data)
+{
+	int *count = data;
+	(*count)++;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void resource_test_walk_iomem_res_desc(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct resource root = {
+		.name = "Resource Walk Test",
+	};
+	struct resource res[8];
+	int count;
+
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0,
+			allocate_resource(&iomem_resource, &root, 0x100000,
+				0, ~0, 0x100000, NULL, NULL));
+
+	/* build the resource tree */
+	res[0] = DEFINE_RES_NAMED(root.start + 0x0000, 0x1000, "SYSRAM 1",
+			IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM);
+	res[1] = DEFINE_RES_NAMED(root.start + 0x1000, 0x1000, "OTHER", 0);
+
+	res[2] = DEFINE_RES_NAMED(root.start + 0x3000, 0x1000, "NESTED", 0);
+	res[3] = DEFINE_RES_NAMED(root.start + 0x3800, 0x0400, "SYSRAM 2",
+			IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM);
+
+	res[4] = DEFINE_RES_NAMED(root.start + 0x4000, 0x1000, "SYSRAM 3",
+			IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, request_resource(&root, &res[0]));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, request_resource(&root, &res[1]));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, request_resource(&root, &res[2]));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, request_resource(&res[2], &res[3]));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, request_resource(&root, &res[4]));
+
+	/* walk the entire region */
+	count = 0;
+	walk_iomem_res_desc(IORES_DESC_NONE, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
+			root.start, root.end, &count, resource_walk_count);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 3);
+
+	/* walk the region requested by res[1] */
+	count = 0;
+	walk_iomem_res_desc(IORES_DESC_NONE, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
+			res[1].start, res[1].end, &count, resource_walk_count);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 0);
+
+	/* walk the region requested by res[2] */
+	count = 0;
+	walk_iomem_res_desc(IORES_DESC_NONE, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
+			res[2].start, res[2].end, &count, resource_walk_count);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 1);
+
+	/* walk the region requested by res[4] */
+	count = 0;
+	walk_iomem_res_desc(IORES_DESC_NONE, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
+			res[4].start, res[4].end, &count, resource_walk_count);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 1);
+
+	release_resource(&root);
+}
+
 static struct kunit_case resource_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(resource_test_union),
 	KUNIT_CASE(resource_test_intersection),
+	KUNIT_CASE(resource_test_walk_iomem_res_desc),
 	{}
 };
 
-- 
2.45.1.467.gbab1589fc0-goog