| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240605234720.GA3441001-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 17:47:20 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/11] of: Add a KUnit test for overlays and test
managed APIs
On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 03:38:02PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Test the KUnit test managed overlay APIs. Confirm that platform devices
> are created and destroyed properly. This provides us confidence that the
> test managed APIs work correctly and can be relied upon to provide tests
> with fake platform devices and device nodes via overlays compiled into
> the kernel image.
>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
> Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>
> Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/of/.kunitconfig | 1 +
> drivers/of/Kconfig | 10 +++
> drivers/of/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso | 9 +++
> drivers/of/overlay_test.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 137 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso
> create mode 100644 drivers/of/overlay_test.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/.kunitconfig b/drivers/of/.kunitconfig
> index 5a8fee11978c..4c53d2c7a275 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/.kunitconfig
> +++ b/drivers/of/.kunitconfig
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> CONFIG_KUNIT=y
> CONFIG_OF=y
> CONFIG_OF_KUNIT_TEST=y
> +CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY_KUNIT_TEST=y
> diff --git a/drivers/of/Kconfig b/drivers/of/Kconfig
> index dd726c7056bf..0e2d608c3e20 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/of/Kconfig
> @@ -107,6 +107,16 @@ config OF_OVERLAY
> While this option is selected automatically when needed, you can
> enable it manually to improve device tree unit test coverage.
>
> +config OF_OVERLAY_KUNIT_TEST
> + tristate "Device Tree overlay KUnit tests" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> + depends on KUNIT
> + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> + select OF_OVERLAY
> + help
> + This option builds KUnit unit tests for the device tree overlay code.
> +
> + If unsure, say N here, but this option is safe to enable.
> +
> config OF_NUMA
> bool
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/Makefile b/drivers/of/Makefile
> index 2ae909adde49..abd9c578343b 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/of/Makefile
> @@ -21,5 +21,6 @@ endif
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) += of_kunit_helpers.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_OF_KUNIT_TEST) += of_test.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY_KUNIT_TEST) += overlay_test.o kunit_overlay_test.dtbo.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_OF_UNITTEST) += unittest-data/
> diff --git a/drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso b/drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..85f20b4b4c16
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/dts-v1/;
> +/plugin/;
> +
> +&{/} {
> + kunit-test {
> + compatible = "test,empty";
> + };
> +};
> diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay_test.c b/drivers/of/overlay_test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9a8083c3a659
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/of/overlay_test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * KUnit tests for device tree overlays
> + */
> +#include <linux/device/bus.h>
> +#include <linux/kconfig.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +
> +#include <kunit/of.h>
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +
> +static const char * const kunit_node_name = "kunit-test";
> +static const char * const kunit_compatible = "test,empty";
> +
> +/* Test that of_overlay_apply_kunit() adds a node to the live tree */
> +static void of_overlay_apply_kunit_apply(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np;
> +
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0,
> + of_overlay_apply_kunit(test, kunit_overlay_test));
> +
> + np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, kunit_node_name);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> + of_node_put(np);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Test that of_overlay_apply_kunit() creates platform devices with the
> + * expected device_node
> + */
> +static void of_overlay_apply_kunit_platform_device(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev;
> + struct device_node *np;
> +
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0,
> + of_overlay_apply_kunit(test, kunit_overlay_test));
> +
> + np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, kunit_node_name);
> + of_node_put_kunit(test, np);
Moving target, but we now have of_node_put() cleanups. Would that work
here instead?
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> +
> + pdev = of_find_device_by_node(np);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev);
> + if (pdev)
> + put_device(&pdev->dev);
> +}
> +
> +static int of_overlay_bus_match_compatible(struct device *dev, const void *data)
> +{
> + return of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, data);
> +}
> +
> +/* Test that of_overlay_apply_kunit() cleans up after the test is finished */
> +static void of_overlay_apply_kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct kunit fake;
> + struct platform_device *pdev;
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct device_node *np;
> +
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY))
> + kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY");
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_EARLY_FLATTREE))
> + kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_OF_EARLY_FLATTREE for root node");
> +
> + kunit_init_test(&fake, "fake test", NULL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, fake.status, KUNIT_SUCCESS);
> +
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0,
> + of_overlay_apply_kunit(&fake, kunit_overlay_test));
> +
> + np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, kunit_node_name);
> + of_node_put(np); /* Not derefing 'np' after this */
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> +
> + pdev = of_find_device_by_node(np);
Don't you need to hold a ref on np until here?
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev);
> + put_device(&pdev->dev); /* Not derefing 'pdev' after this */
> +
> + /* Remove overlay */
> + kunit_cleanup(&fake);
> +
> + /* The node and device should be removed */
> + np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, kunit_node_name);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, NULL, np);
> + of_node_put(np);
> +
> + dev = bus_find_device(&platform_bus_type, NULL, kunit_compatible,
> + of_overlay_bus_match_compatible);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, NULL, dev);
> + put_device(dev);
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case of_overlay_apply_kunit_test_cases[] = {
> + KUNIT_CASE(of_overlay_apply_kunit_apply),
> + KUNIT_CASE(of_overlay_apply_kunit_platform_device),
> + KUNIT_CASE(of_overlay_apply_kunit_cleanup),
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Test suite for test managed device tree overlays.
> + */
> +static struct kunit_suite of_overlay_apply_kunit_suite = {
> + .name = "of_overlay_apply_kunit",
> + .test_cases = of_overlay_apply_kunit_test_cases,
> +};
> +
> +kunit_test_suites(
> + &of_overlay_apply_kunit_suite,
> +);
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> --
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git/
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sboyd/spmi.git
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists