lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZmAz0uEKV_9ijfSF@J2N7QTR9R3>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 10:45:54 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Trace Kernel <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace/selftests: Fix pid test with function graph not
 showing pids

On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 03:25:50PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> 
> The pid filtering test will set the pid filters and make sure that both
> function and function_graph tracing honors the filters. But the
> function_graph tracer test was failing because the PID was not being
> filtered properly. That's because the funcgraph-proc option wasn't getting
> set. Without that option the PID is not shown.
> 
> Instead we get:
> 
> 	+ cat trace
> 	# tracer: function_graph
> 	#
> 	# CPU  DURATION                  FUNCTION CALLS
> 	# |     |   |                     |   |   |   |
> 	 3) ! 143.685 us  |  kernel_clone();
> 	 3) ! 127.055 us  |  kernel_clone();
> 	 1) ! 127.170 us  |  kernel_clone();
> 	 3) ! 126.840 us  |  kernel_clone();
> 
> When we should be getting:
> 
> 	+ cat trace
> 	# tracer: function_graph
> 	#
> 	# CPU  TASK/PID         DURATION                  FUNCTION CALLS
> 	# |     |    |           |   |                     |   |   |   |
> 	 4)    bash-939    | # 1070.009 us |  kernel_clone();
> 	 4)    bash-939    | # 1116.903 us |  kernel_clone();
> 	 5)    bash-939    | ! 976.133 us  |  kernel_clone();
> 	 5)    bash-939    | ! 954.012 us  |  kernel_clone();
> 
> The test looks for the pids it is filtering and will fail if it can not
> find them. Without fungraph-proc option set, it will not be displayed and
> the test will fail.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zl9JFnzKGuUM10X2@J2N7QTR9R3/
> 
> Fixes: 35b944a997e2 ("selftests/ftrace: Add function_graph tracer to func-filter-pid test")
> Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>

Applying this makes the pid filter tests go from FAIL to PASS, so FWIW:

Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>

Mark.

> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func-filter-pid.tc | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func-filter-pid.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func-filter-pid.tc
> index c6fc9d31a496..8dcce001881d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func-filter-pid.tc
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func-filter-pid.tc
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>  # Also test it on an instance directory
>  
>  do_function_fork=1
> +do_funcgraph_proc=1
>  
>  if [ ! -f options/function-fork ]; then
>      do_function_fork=0
> @@ -28,6 +29,7 @@ fi
>  
>  if [ $do_funcgraph_proc -eq 1 ]; then
>      orig_value2=`cat options/funcgraph-proc`
> +    echo 1 > options/funcgraph-proc
>  fi
>  
>  do_reset() {
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ