[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b49c801c-6628-40a6-8294-0876d8871ba7@leemhuis.info>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 16:15:58 +0200
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, frank-w@...lic-files.de,
Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
Frank Wunderlich <linux@...web.de>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: mt7622: fix switch probe on bananapi-r64
On 07.06.24 16:03, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-06-06 at 10:26 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> On 31.05.24 08:10, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>>> On 31/05/2024 08.40, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>>> [adding Paolo, who committed the culprit]
>>
>> /me slowly wonders if the culprit should be reverted for now (see below)
>> and should be reapplied later together with the matching changes from
>> Arınç ÜNAL.
>
> FWIS I think a revert should be avoided, given that a fix is available
> and nicely small.
Yeah, on one hand I agree; but on the other it seems that the
maintainers that would have to take care of the dt changes to fix this
until now remained silent in this thread, apart from Rob who sent the
mail regarding the warnings.
I put those maintainers in the To: field of this mail, maybe that might
lead to some reaction.
Ciao, Thorsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists