linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: mt7622: fix switch probe on bananapi-r64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 13:30:29 +0200
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
 Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, frank-w@...lic-files.de,
 Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>,
 Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
 Frank Wunderlich <linux@...web.de>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: mt7622: fix switch probe on bananapi-r64

On 07.06.24 16:15, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 07.06.24 16:03, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>> On Thu, 2024-06-06 at 10:26 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> On 31.05.24 08:10, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>>>> On 31/05/2024 08.40, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>>>> [adding Paolo, who committed the culprit]
>>>
>>> /me slowly wonders if the culprit should be reverted for now (see below)
>>> and should be reapplied later together with the matching changes from
>>> Arınç ÜNAL.
>>
>> FWIS I think a revert should be avoided, given that a fix is available
>> and nicely small.
> 
> Yeah, on one hand I agree; but on the other it seems that the
> maintainers that would have to take care of the dt changes to fix this
> until now remained silent in this thread, apart from Rob who sent the
> mail regarding the warnings.
> 
> I put those maintainers in the To: field of this mail, maybe that might
> lead to some reaction.

Still no reply from the DRS folks or any other progress I noticed. Guess
that means I will soon have no other choice than to get Linus involved,
as this looks stuck. :-( #sigh

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.