[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <90dc0dfc-4c67-4ea1-b705-0585d6e2ec47@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:52:12 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel@...labora.com, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] selftest: x86: conform tests to TAP format output
On 5/27/24 23:04, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> Kind reminder
>
> On 4/14/24 6:18 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>> In this series, 4 tests are being conformed to TAP.
>>
>> Muhammad Usama Anjum (4):
>> selftests: x86: check_initial_reg_state: conform test to TAP format
>> output
>> selftests: x86: corrupt_xstate_header: conform test to TAP format
>> output
>> selftests: fsgsbase_restore: conform test to TAP format output
>> selftests: entry_from_vm86: conform test to TAP format output
>>
>> .../selftests/x86/check_initial_reg_state.c | 24 ++--
>> .../selftests/x86/corrupt_xstate_header.c | 30 +++--
>> tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c | 109 ++++++++--------
>> .../testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase_restore.c | 117 +++++++++---------
>> 4 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 141 deletions(-)
>>
>
These patches usually go through x86 repo to avoid merge conflicts.
I need ack from x86 maintainers to take these. I don't see x86 list
cc'ed.
Please make sure to include everybody on these threads to get quicker
response.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists