linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] selftest: x86: conform tests to TAP format output

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <386da8e3-1559-4ec2-9a66-f5f3f6405a2b@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:19:08 +0500
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
 Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
 x86@...nel.org
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>, kernel@...labora.com,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] selftest: x86: conform tests to TAP format output

Adding Borislav, Dave and x86 mailing list:
	Please review the series.

On 6/8/24 1:52 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 5/27/24 23:04, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>> Kind reminder
>>
>> On 4/14/24 6:18 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>>> In this series, 4 tests are being conformed to TAP.
>>>
>>> Muhammad Usama Anjum (4):
>>>    selftests: x86: check_initial_reg_state: conform test to TAP format
>>>      output
>>>    selftests: x86: corrupt_xstate_header: conform test to TAP format
>>>      output
>>>    selftests: fsgsbase_restore: conform test to TAP format output
>>>    selftests: entry_from_vm86: conform test to TAP format output
>>>
>>>   .../selftests/x86/check_initial_reg_state.c   |  24 ++--
>>>   .../selftests/x86/corrupt_xstate_header.c     |  30 +++--
>>>   tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c | 109 ++++++++--------
>>>   .../testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase_restore.c  | 117 +++++++++---------
>>>   4 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 141 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
> 
> These patches usually go through x86 repo to avoid merge conflicts.
> 
> I need ack from x86 maintainers to take these. I don't see x86 list
> cc'ed.
> 
> Please make sure to include everybody on these threads to get quicker
> response.
It seems like selftests/x86 path is missing from Maintainers file and it
causes these issues. I'll look at fixing it.

> 
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
> 
> 

-- 
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum