| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <c2bab3f7157e6f3b71723cebc0533ef0a908a3b5.camel@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 21:46:27 +0000
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
To: "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>
CC: "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>, "Huang, Kai"
<kai.huang@...el.com>, "sagis@...gle.com" <sagis@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Aktas, Erdem"
<erdemaktas@...gle.com>, "Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
"dmatlack@...gle.com" <dmatlack@...gle.com>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org"
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>,
"isaku.yamahata@...il.com" <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Reflect tearing down mirror
page tables
On Fri, 2024-06-07 at 13:37 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> > + /* Update mirrored page tables for page table about to be freed */
> > + int (*reflect_free_spt)(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, enum pg_level
> > level,
> > + void *mirrored_spt);
> > +
> > + /* Update mirrored page table from spte getting removed, and flush
> > TLB */
> > + int (*reflect_remove_spte)(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, enum pg_level
> > level,
> > + kvm_pfn_t pfn);
>
> Again, maybe free_external_spt and zap_external_spte?
Yep, I'm on board.
>
> Also, please rename the last argument to pfn_for_gfn. I'm not proud of
> it, but it took me over 10 minutes to understand if the pfn referred
> to the gfn itself, or to the external SP that holds the spte...
> There's a possibility that it isn't just me. :)
Ah, I see how that could be confusing.
>
> (In general, this patch took me a _lot_ to review... there were a
> couple of places that left me incomprehensibly puzzled, more on this
> below).
Sorry for that. Thanks for taking the time to weed through it anyway.
>
> > bool (*has_wbinvd_exit)(void);
> >
> > u64 (*get_l2_tsc_offset)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> > index 41b1d3f26597..1245f6a48dbe 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> > @@ -346,6 +346,29 @@ static void tdp_mmu_unlink_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct
> > kvm_mmu_page *sp)
> > spin_unlock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
> > }
> >
> > +static void reflect_removed_spte(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
> > + u64 old_spte, u64 new_spte,
> > + int level)
>
> new_spte is not used and can be dropped. Also, tdp_mmu_zap_external_spte?
Oh, yep. In v19 there used to be a KVM_BUG_ON(), but we can get rid of it.
>
> > +{
> > + bool was_present = is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte);
> > + bool was_leaf = was_present && is_last_spte(old_spte, level);
>
> Just put it below:
>
> if (!is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte))
> return;
Right, this is another miss from removing the KVM_BUG_ON()s.
>
> /* Here we only care about zapping the external leaf PTEs. */
> if (!is_last_spte(old_spte, level))
>
> > + kvm_pfn_t old_pfn = spte_to_pfn(old_spte);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Allow only leaf page to be zapped. Reclaim non-leaf page tables
> > page
>
> This comment left me confused, so I'll try to rephrase and see if I
> can explain what happens. Correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> The only paths to handle_removed_pt() are:
> - kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_leafs()
> - kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots()
>
> but because kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast() does not operate on mirror roots,
> the latter can only happen at VM destruction time.
>
> But it's not clear why it's worth mentioning it here, or even why it
> is special at all. Isn't that just what handle_removed_pt() does at
> the end? Why does it matter that it's only done at VM destruction
> time?
>
> In other words, it seems to me that this comment is TMI. And if I am
> wrong (which may well be), the extra information should explain the
> "why" in more detail, and it should be around the call to
> reflect_free_spt, not here.
TDX of course has the limitation around the ordering of the zapping S-EPT. So I
read the comment to be referring to how the implementation avoids zapping any
non-leaf PTEs during TD runtime.
But I'm going to have to circle back here after investigating a bit more. Isaku,
any comments on this comment and conditional?
>
> > + return;
> > + /* Zapping leaf spte is allowed only when write lock is held. */
> > + lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > + /* Because write lock is held, operation should success. */
> > + ret = static_call(kvm_x86_reflect_remove_spte)(kvm, gfn, level,
> > old_pfn);
> > + KVM_BUG_ON(ret, kvm);
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * handle_removed_pt() - handle a page table removed from the TDP
> > structure
> > *
> > @@ -441,6 +464,22 @@ static void handle_removed_pt(struct kvm *kvm,
> > tdp_ptep_t pt, bool shared)
> > }
> > handle_changed_spte(kvm, kvm_mmu_page_as_id(sp), gfn,
> > old_spte, REMOVED_SPTE, sp->role,
> > shared);
> > + if (is_mirror_sp(sp)) {
> > + KVM_BUG_ON(shared, kvm);
> > + reflect_removed_spte(kvm, gfn, old_spte,
> > REMOVED_SPTE, level);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (is_mirror_sp(sp) &&
> > + WARN_ON(static_call(kvm_x86_reflect_free_spt)(kvm, sp->gfn, sp-
> > >role.level,
> > +
> > kvm_mmu_mirrored_spt(sp)))) {
>
> Please use base_gfn and level here, instead of fishing them from sp.
Oh, yep, thanks.
>
> > + /*
> > + * Failed to free page table page in mirror page table and
> > + * there is nothing to do further.
> > + * Intentionally leak the page to prevent the kernel from
> > + * accessing the encrypted page.
> > + */
> > + sp->mirrored_spt = NULL;
> > }
> >
> > call_rcu(&sp->rcu_head, tdp_mmu_free_sp_rcu_callback);
> > @@ -778,9 +817,11 @@ static u64 tdp_mmu_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id,
> > tdp_ptep_t sptep,
> > role.level = level;
> > handle_changed_spte(kvm, as_id, gfn, old_spte, new_spte, role,
> > false);
> >
> > - /* Don't support setting for the non-atomic case */
> > - if (is_mirror_sptep(sptep))
> > + if (is_mirror_sptep(sptep)) {
> > + /* Only support zapping for the non-atomic case */
>
> Like for patch 10, this comment should point out why we never get here
> for mirror SPs.
Ok.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists