[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0bd0e529-2995-4699-875a-f6b529b7d322@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 12:13:16 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Alex Shi <seakeel@...il.com>, alexs@...nel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, izik.eidus@...ellosystems.com,
willy@...radead.org, aarcange@...hat.com, chrisw@...s-sol.org,
hughd@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] mm/ksm: add anonymous check in find_mergeable_vma
On 07.06.24 11:33, Alex Shi wrote:
>
>
> On 6/5/24 5:56 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 05.06.24 11:53, alexs@...nel.org wrote:
>>> From: "Alex Shi (tencent)" <alexs@...nel.org>
>>>
>>> We do vma_set_anonyous in do_mmap(), and then vma_is_anonymous()
>>> checking workable, use it as a extra check since ksm only care anonymous
>>> pages.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi (tencent) <alexs@...nel.org>
>>> ---
>>> mm/ksm.c | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
>>> index f5138f43f0d2..088bce39cd33 100644
>>> --- a/mm/ksm.c
>>> +++ b/mm/ksm.c
>>> @@ -742,7 +742,8 @@ static struct vm_area_struct *find_mergeable_vma(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>> if (ksm_test_exit(mm))
>>> return NULL;
>>> vma = vma_lookup(mm, addr);
>>> - if (!vma || !(vma->vm_flags & VM_MERGEABLE) || !vma->anon_vma)
>>> + if (!vma || !(vma->vm_flags & VM_MERGEABLE) || !vma->anon_vma ||
>>> + !vma_is_anonymous(vma))
>>
>> Doesn't KSM also apply to COW'ed pages in !anon mappings? At least that's what I recall.
> I didn't a evidence for this. :(
>
> In write_protect_page(), "PageAnonExclusive(&folio->page);" has a "VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS(!PageAnon(page), page);"
> So is this hints the vma also need to be anonymous one?
vma_is_anonymous(vma) is restricted to anonymous folios and the shared
zeropage, but other VMAs (MAP_PRIVATE file-backed VMAs) can contain
anonymous folios as well.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists